Vice President JD Vance recently addressed Mike Waltz’s departure from his post as National Security Advisor, highlighting that he was reassociated rather than fired. Originally a congressman representing Florida’s sixth district, Waltz was among the first officials named by Donald Trump following his 2024 election triumph.
Trump said on May 1 that Waltz will be leaving his advising post just a few days after marking his 100th day in office. Rather, Trump wants him nominated as the next US Ambassador to the UN. As Trump stated in a post on Truth Social, praising Waltz’s commitment to our nation, “From his time in uniform on the battlefield, to his tenure in Congress, to his current position as Mike Waltz, he has worked hard to put our Nation’s interests first, and I am sure he will do the same in his new position.”

As a result of Waltz’s involvement in a significant security breach, he has decided to move on from the company. After a journalist from The Atlantic was unintentionally included in a Signal group chat where classified military plans regarding possible US strikes in Yemen were discussed, he came under investigation. Waltz claimed full responsibility during an interview with Fox News following the incident. I put together the group. It is humiliating. We will find the truth about it.
Although Trump elected not to fire Waltz and publicly backed him throughout this spat, insiders told ABC News that their relationship suffered behind closed doors. Vance, though, defended the choice to shift Waltz to another spot.

Waltz was not “let go” because of the breach, he explained in an interview with Fox News’ Special Report anchor Bret Baier. Instead, Vance said that Waltz’s new position may be seen as an advancement since the government brought him in to carry out essential reforms inside the National Security Council, and he effectively achieved those objectives.
As the National Security Council continues to negotiate complex global issues and handle internal challenges, this reassignment emphasizes how continuously changing it is under Trump’s direction.
He went on to remark, “I respect Mike. He is a really remarkable person; both the president and I entirely trust him.

“But as we advance the reforms at the National Security Council, he would be more suited as the UN ambassador”.
“As you may have heard, Marco Rubio is the temporary National Security Council leader designated by the president”.
” Now, some media are trying to present this as a firing. Indeed, Donald Trump has let go of many people in the past, usually without providing Senate-confirmed posts following. In this instance, though, he thinks Mike Waltz will better serve the government and, most crucially, the American people in another role.
And I exactly agree with that judgment.

Waltz responded on social networking platform X, “I’m truly honored to continue serving President Trump and our wonderful country. “
After Waltz left, Trump named Marco Rubio, now Secretary of State, to cover for the National Security Advisor until a permanent successor was identified.
This change emphasizes the continuous changes the National Security Council undergoes as the government tries to maximize its leadership at a pivotal juncture. Recent statistics show that the National Security Council is extremely important in determining US foreign policy and guaranteeing national security, therefore influencing millions of Americans daily.